Achieve accommodation, eliminate spherical aberration and other
errors, and minimize incision size. These three ends together
represent the grand dream of IOL development. Many promising lenses
are in the pipeline, and each puts us one step closer to the perfect
lens implant. Here, we review three of the newest efforts.
Tetraflex
IOL
Design. The Tetraflex IOL (Lenstec) is a
small-incision, single-optic accommodative IOL. Made from
hydroxymethylmethacrylate, it has a 26 percent water content. This
one-piece lens has a 5.75- millimeter equiconvex optic, Tetraflex
haptics and a square-edged design to inhibit posterior capsular
opacification, said Mark Packer, MD, FACS, clinical assistant
professor of ophthalmology, Oregon Health & Science University,
and in private practice in Eugene, Ore.
Delivery. The lens is implanted through a 2.5-mm
incision, and Robert E. Kellan, MD, who invented the Tetraflex,
noted, “The contoured haptic design with an anterior vault allows
the Tetraflex to take advantage of all forces induced during
accommodation.” Dr. Kellan is director, Kellan Eye Center, Boston,
assistant professor of ophthalmology, Boston University, and
associate staff, ophthalmology, Tufts-New England Medical
Center.
Dynamics. Questions remain about exactly how
natural accommodation works and how to measure it objectively in any
IOL. Theoretically, two forces are at play during accommodation:
anterior movement of the vitreous face and contraction of the
ciliary muscle. “The Tetraflex was designed to use these forces to
provide anterior axial movement of the lens. The anterior angle
orientation (5-degree contoured haptics) and optic are designed to
move as a unit, without any hinge action. The haptic design allows
the lens to move with the entire capsular bag. It does not require
postoperative cycloplegia,” Dr. Packer said.
“With accommodative effort, the entire lens moves, and the optic
changes its radius very slightly to provide good vision without
spectacles across the range needed for 95 percent of daily
activities,” Dr. Kellan said. He noted that Lenstec is using the
iTrace Aberrometer to study aberration induced at the time of near
fixation and far fixation. In the FDA trials, 95.6 percent of 91
reported cases had accommodative amplitude of more than 1 D, 69.2
percent could accommodate more than 2 D and 19.8 percent more than 3
D, he said. He uses the analogy of a handshake to describe the
accommodation process: “Some handshakes are firm and others are
soft. The people who can squeeze firmly would get good results. This
suggests that ‘exercises’ improve outcomes over time. It also
appears anecdotally that aggressive readers get better results.
Perhaps, someone who does not read a lot would not be so motivated
to ‘use’ their near vision and exercise to improve.”
Development. The Tetraflex has been approved in
Europe, Australia and the Middle East since 2003, with about 6,000
lenses implanted so far, according to Dr. Kellan. U.S. trials are
beginning, with about 50 lenses implanted to date. It should be
ready for U.S. sale by 2008.
SmartIOL
Design. The SmartIOL (Medennium) is an
injectable, adjustable, accommodative IOL. The SmartIOL concept is
based on this hypothesis: “An IOL that fills the capsular bag would
allow the ciliary muscle to resume control of lens shape alteration,
thereby producing focus along the entire accommodative range,”
explained David F. Chang, MD, clinical professor, University of
California, San Francisco, and in private practice, Los Altos,
Calif.
“Many believe that the best way to achieve accommodation is to
fill the capsular bag with a flexible gel,” Dr. Chang said, “but
this approach must surmount many obstacles. One must determine how
much gel to inject and how to predictably control the resulting lens
power. The capsulorhexis must be small, so that it can be sealed to
confine the gel. This may require new surgical technologies, which
must be sufficient to remove a brunescent cataract. Finally, how
does one control the critical optical interface in the central
location of the capsulorhexis?” said Dr. Chang.
This lens has unique thermoplastic properties that permit a
temperature-induced change in shape, Dr. Packer explained. Because
wax is chemically bonded to the acrylic polymer, the material
remains in a solid state at room temperature. “Each acrylic unit of
the lens material has a 16-18 carbon side chain. Varying the number
of side chains can change the material’s thermodynamic properties.
In its current composition, the chemically bonded wax accounts for
75 percent of the material’s weight.” Dr. Packer said.
Delivery. He explained that the lens is heated
and compressed into a thin, 50-mm long rod, then cooled. “This
rod-shaped lens can be implanted through a small incision [with the
current design, about 3.5 mm in width], through a standard
capsulorhexis.”
Dynamics. Then, Dr. Packer continued, “Because
the wax component melts at body temperature, adjusting the
percentage of wax content produces a semisoft gelatinous polymer
once the lens is in the eye. As the rod warms to body temperature,
it changes back to a pliable lens measuring 10 mm in diameter and
3.5 mm in thickness. The lens fills the capsular bag as it recovers
its predetermined shape and dioptric power.” Dr. Chang noted that
with this technology, the surgeon does not have to close the
capsulorhexis, nor alter standard phaco technique.
The SmartIOL may have other benefits, too. Pressure of the optic
against the lens capsule may inhibit lens epithelial cell (LEC)
metaplasia and migration, thus preventing anterior and/or posterior
capsular opacification, Dr. Packer explained. “If the capsule does
become cloudy, one could safely perform a YAG capsulotomy without
leakage of the lens material. Because the lens completely fills the
bag, it may eliminate anterior movement of the vitreous body and the
attendant risks of retinal detachment in high myopia,” he
reported.
Development. Using an injector system, Samuel
Masket, MD, has successfully implanted SmartIOL prototypes into
human cadaver capsular bags. Dr. Masket is in private practice in
Los Angeles and is clinical professor of ophthalomogy, University of
California, Los Angeles. In vitro testing has shown that the lens is
flexible enough to allow compression by forces on the scale of those
that act on the capsular bag, Dr. Packer reported. “The next step is
to determine the right amount of lens elasticity to allow just
enough shape change in response to ciliary muscle contraction,” Dr.
Chang said.
Further development of this lens technology is on hold until the
company secures funding for an FDA trial, explained Dr. Masket.
UltraChoice
1.0
Design. The UltraChoice 1.0 (ThinOptX) is a
plate-haptic, hydrophilic acrylic IOL. It is so thin that “it can be
rolled into a small cylinder and implanted/injected through an
ultra-small incision no larger than 1.5 mm,” said Kenneth J. Hoffer,
MD, chairman of the board of ThinOptX and clinical professor of
ophthalmology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Delivery. In fact, some researchers are
implanting the UltraChoice through an incision less than 1 mm long,
according to Dr. Packer. He added that it is one of the best current
IOL candidates for microincision surgery. “For the past three years,
I have performed all of my cataract and lens extractions through two
paracentesis incisions of 1.2 mm width. IOL insertion has, of
course, required the construction of a third incision,” Dr. Packer
said.
Dynamics. This lens is designed to eliminate
spherical aberration. Dr. Packer explained that one surface of the
lens has a continuous curvature, as with traditional lenses. The
second surface contains a series of steps, each 50 micrometers in
height. Each step has a unique surface curve, a slightly different
radius and can be focused on a single focal point. He pointed out
that this “ensures a constant dioptric power with reference to the
aperture size or distance from the lens axis. “
The lens should be aspheric, as are all lenses used in optical
equipment, from telescopes to the 20 D lens used with the indirect
ophthalmoscope,” he said. Most pseudophakic IOLs are designed as a
portion of a sphere, he said. Lens thickness also causes
aberrations, because light rays travel a greater distance in the
thicker portion of the lens, Dr. Packer explained. With a central
axis thickness of 50 µm for a meniscus lens and 300 µm for a
biconvex optic, the ThinOptX lens eliminates this type of error as
well, he said.
Development. FDA studies began in July 2004.
This lens was approved in Europe in 2002, and European studies are
ongoing.
________________________________
Dr.
Chang is on the medical advisory board for Medennium, but
has no financial interest in the SmartIOL.
Dr. Hoffer is chairman of the board of
ThinOptX, and his family owns shares in the company.
Dr. Kellan is inventor of the Tetraflex
lenses, sold his patents for this technology and holds no current
financial interest in this IOL.
Dr. Masket is a consultant for Alcon,
Medennium and Visiogen. He resigned his post as medical director for
Medennium last year.
Dr. Packer is a consultant for Advanced
Medical Optics, Advanced Vision Science, Visiogen, Carl Zeiss
Meditec and Bausch & Lomb. He has received honoraria, travel and
research funds from Eyeonics, Staar Surgical and Alcon
Laboratories.
